Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Daugherty
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1922No. A-4165PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.
On the 17th day of December, 1921, a complaint was filed in the municipal court of the city of Blackwell, charging the petitioners, Mrs. Charles Daugherty and J. E. Eeed, with occupying a room for immoral purposes, in violation of Ordinance No. 210 and' amendments' thereto, of the city of Blackwell. On the same day a warrant was issued out of the municipal court, upon authority of which the petitioners were arrested and brought before the municipal court, where they were duly arraigned and pleaded not guilty. On that day the petitioners demanded a trial by jury, whereupon the municipal court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rassmussen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bishop v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Cumpton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Clayman v. City of BartlesvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.