Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1688 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is an appeal by the Overmyer Mold Company and its insurance carrier, from the decision of a referee, affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, directing the employer to reimburse a workmen’s compensation claimant, Mr. William H. Collier, the sum of $210 for medical services furnished by a chiropractor.

The facts are not in dispute. Mr. Collier suffered a compensable back injury on November 17, 1972. He first sought the medical attention of one Dr. Joseph Testa, a physician designated by his employer, pursuant to section 306 (f) of the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanyok v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Houlihan v. Joseph J. Scheiter & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Shank v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Mine Safety Appliance Co. v. RoyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Hilton Hotel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GAF Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Neville Chemical Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API