Rahm v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. G. H. Noonan. Appellant was indicted for perjury. At his trial he was convicted and his punishment assessed at six years confinement in the penitentiary. The rulings of the court on this appeal do not call for a statement of the evidence.
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the court below upon an indictment charging him with perjury.
A preliminary motion was made to quash the indictment, mainly upon the ground that it had been tampered with by being interlined and amended as to material matters by some one whose handwriting was different from that of the clerk, district attorney, or foreman of the grand jury. This motion to quash was sworn to. In the order overruling the same it was recited that when the motion was called the defendant refused to introduce any evidence or witnesses in support of the matters of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Blackmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Elton Ray Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Pollard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Ex Parte MetcalfCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.