Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1999No. 97CA1679PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PLANK.

Defendant, David C. Washington, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion seeking to set aside, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, his prior conviction entered on a plea of guilty. We affirm.

In 1991, defendant entered a guilty plea to a charge of distribution of a controlled substance under the statute then codified as §18-18-105, C.R.S.1973, as amended (repealed and reenacted as §18-18-405, C.R.S. 1998) and was sentenced to four years in prison. He was thereafter convicted of another drug-related felony, his third, and was sentenced to ten years in prison…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. In Re Interrogatories of the House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Cole v. United Services Automobile Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Ledden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Dakotans for Health v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. People v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API