Legal Opinion
HARTZELL v. ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS CORP.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01873Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM HARTZELL, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 21-1873-KSM v. ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. May 11, 2022 Plaintiff William Hartzell brings claims against his former employer, Adaptable Systems Corporation, doing business as Corporate Payroll Services, for violations of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). In essence, Hartzell argues that Adaptable Systems misled him about his right to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.