Legal Opinion

Porter v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 6, 1963No. [App. No. 14, September Term, 1963 (Adv.).]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

On December 26, 1961 the applicant, Thomas H. Porter, III, was sentenced to 2 years in the Maryland House of Correction by the Criminal Court of Baltimore on a charge of statutory burglary. He was sent to Patuxent Institution for examination, and on February 8, 1963, after a jury found him to be a defective delinquent at a hearing at which he was represented by counsel, he was committed to Patuxent. On February 11, 1963 he filed a “Motion for a New Trial”. The clerk of the lower court wrote Porter informing him, in effect, that the motion would be treated as an application for leave to appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Schultz v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Meredith v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Gee v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Murel v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Gilliard v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Foster v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Morgan v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API