Foster v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency by Judge Byrnes, the chief contentions made by counsel for the applicant go to the sufficiency of the evidence, and the fact that Dr. Boslow was permitted to express an opinion based in part upon the reports of other experts. There is no merit in these contentions. See Tippett v. Director, 233 Md. 647, 648, and McDonough v. Director, 229 Md. 626, *672634. The applicant makes additional allegations as to incompetency of counsel, collusion, and other claims too indefinite to require discussion. Porter v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Porter v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Tippett v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964