Legal Opinion
Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 25, 1993No. Court 92-08-00559PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 56.1 plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record. Plaintiffs contest the negative preliminary determination of the International Trade Commission, in its investigation in Crushed Limestone from Mexico, 57 Fed.Reg. 31,386 (1992). This action is brought pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(l)(C) (19881 and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988).
BACKGROUND
Texas Crushed Stone Co., Parker LaFarge Inc., and Gulf Coast Limestone, Inc. (plaintiffs) filed a petition on May 20,1992 with the ITC and Commerce alleging that an industry in the United States was materially…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- CEMEX, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United States, and Cemex Venezuela, S.A.C.A. ("Vencemos")Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'nUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.