Legal Opinion

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Oregon Bureau of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1997No. 95-35335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

The question on appeal is whether the arrangement by which Alaska Airlines, Inc., pays its employees for sick leave is subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). If it is not, then Oregon may apply its parental leave laws to require Alaska Airlines to permit employees to utilize sick leave for family leave purposes, such as care of sick children. We conclude that ERISA does not apply to Alaska Airlines’ sick leave payment system, and that Oregon may apply its law.

BACKGROUND

ERISA regulates “employee welfare benefit plans,” which include plans…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. William Shea, Michael McGuire Michael Kelly, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Armored Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Czechowski v. Tandy Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. California Hospital Association v. HenningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robert Stern v. International Business Machines (IBM), a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Miller v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  3. Villegas v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Cal.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Mostajo v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API