Legal Opinion

Didenti v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1930No. 6175PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, District Judge.

Appellant Didenti, John Huggler, and Jack Esara were charged by indictment with conspiring together, and “with sundry and divers other persons to the grand jurors unknown,” to violate the National Prohibition Act, by manufacturing, possessing, transporting, and selling intoxicating liquor. Six separate overt acts are alleged, in the commission of all of which it is charged the appellant participated. Upon trial the jury acquitted Huggler and Esara, but convicted Didenti, who brings the case here for review, assigning as error the refusal of the trial court to grant his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Anstess v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  3. Bartkus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Eli Lubin and Glenn M. Tharp, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. James Henry PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API