Legal Opinion

Bartkus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 1927No. 3874-3877PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted of violating that portion of the conspiracy statute which provides: “If two or more persons conspire * * * to commit any offense against the United States, * * * and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be fined * * * or imprisoned, * * * or both.” Comp. St. § 10201.

The offense against the United States sought to be charged as the object of the conspiracy is the violation of clause 1 of section 29b of the Bankruptcy Act,, which, though amended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Beavers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. Steigman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Eli Lubin and Glenn M. Tharp, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Safarik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API