Anstess v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was found guilty upon an indictment charging him and one Raymond Johnston and other persons whose names were unknown with conspiring to unlawfully transport and sell intoxicating liquor. Johnston was acquitted.
It is insisted that there is no evidence to support the verdict of guilty against plaintiff in error, and this is the only question presented. It is conceded that he is guilty of transporting liquor, but it is contended that the evidence does not establish that he conspired with any other person .to transport it.
To sustain the verdict, it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Applebaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Kenneth C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Safarik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Backun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.