Legal Opinion
Phillips v. UAW International
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 26, 2016No. Case Number 15-10525PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Tanganeka “Tina” Phillips, while employed as a casino worker by MGM Grand Detroit Casino (“MGM”), became involved in union activity with her local affiliate of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”), which represented casino workers at MGM. She performed paid work for the local, Local 7777 (while employed by MGM), but was never formally employed by the International Union. Nonetheless, she has brought claims in -the present…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mercer v. Amalgamated Transit Union Division 689District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Segler v. Detroit, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Terina M. Calloway v. Michigan Education Association, et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Walker v. The Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025