Hodsden v. Hodsden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Alice M. Hodsden from an order of the district court for Renville county, Webber, J., overruling her demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff, as husband of one of the defendants, to -recover the title to real estate which he caused to be conveyed to his wife, and which he charges she procured by fraud. Only the wife appeared. She interposed a demurrer to the complaint, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court overruled the demurrer.
The complaint is quite lengthy, and charges that the wife continually treated the plaintiff in a cruel and inhuman manner, threatening to shoot him, and used vile and obscene language towards…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Church v. SwetlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- South Texas Mortgage Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hansen v. Daniel Hayes Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.