Meas v. Young
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
This is an appeal from an amended judgment awarding attorney fees to Edward and Marcella Cechvala based on the wrongful acts of their realtors. We conclude that the attorney fees necessarily incurred in the Cechvalas’ defense of these wrongful acts are properly allowable under the facts of this case. That portion of the judgment is affirmed. However, because the trial court did not confine its award to only those attorney fees arising from the defense of the initial litigation, we reverse and remand the cause for a redetermination of recoverable attorney fees.
The Cechvalas are an elderly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- M. F. Roach Co. v. Town of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeChant v. Monarch Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Marquardt v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Hall v. Gregory A. Liebovich Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.