Commonwealth v. Morales
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence after Appellant was convicted of tampering with physical evidence. 1 Appellant was sentenced to incarceration for seven and one-half months. A timely post-sentence motion was denied by operation of law and this direct appeal followed. 2 We affirm.
The facts may be summarized as follows: On April 7, 1994, investigators Stuart Bedics (Bedics) and Colleen Mower (Mower) were participating in an undercover drug surveillance of State and Evans Streets in the City of Bethlehem. From an unmarked vehicle and with the aid of binoculars,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. GovensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. YasipourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Timberlake v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. SharplessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.