Legal Opinion

Barbaresos v. Casaszar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1949No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 43,863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of improved business property fronting approximately 38 feet on Linwood avenue in Detroit. Defendant is the owner of improved business property adjoining plaintiffs’ property on the south and having a Linwood avenue frontage of 77 feet. These properties are.on the westerly side of Linwood. The north 28.91 feet of plaintiffs’ property extends back 119 feet to a paved public alley, but the balance of plain tiffs’ property is only 77 feet deep. Defendant’s property has the same depth of 77 feet back westerly from Linwood, and is bounded on the south by a public street —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bang v. FormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hopkins v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brossart v. CorlettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bickler v. BicklerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Plymouth Canton Community Crier, Inc v. ProseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Loughman v. CouchmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API