Legal Opinion

Bickler v. Bickler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1966No. A-10911PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

The primary purposes of this litigation between Ralph and Max Bickler, brothers, are to establish the common boundary line of their adjoining residential lots and to adjudicate a claim by Ralph to a driveway easement on and over Max’s property.

Suit was filed by Ralph. He sought a mandatory injunction requiring Max to remove a fence erected across the driveway which prevented Ralph’s use thereof for ingress and egress to and from his residence to a public street. He also sought to establish that the common property line between their respective properties was the western…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Othen v. RosierTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Duff v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Howell v. EstesTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wooten v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Holmstrom v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Storms v. TuckTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Holden v. Weidenfeller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1974

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API