Froebel v. Meyer
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kurt Froebel brings this action under the citizen suit provision of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly called the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “Act”), codified as amended at 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387. Froebel alleges that defendants, who include the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”), two DNR officials and Waukesha County, violat ed and continue to violate the Act by discharging pollutants into the Oconomowoc River and North Lake without the requisite permits, as a result of the DNR’s poorly executed removal of Funk’s…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burnette v. CarothersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Burnette v. CarothersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Northgate Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Special Souvenirs, Inc. v. Town of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- United States v. Bay-Houston Towing Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.