Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Hochberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 15, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum; Per Curiam.
The action is to recover rent for the month of April, 1944. The defendant asserts a counterclaim under subdivision (e) of section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925, subd. (e)] for damages in the sum of $150, together with a reasonable counsel fee.
On August 23, 1943, plaintiff leased an apartment to the defendant for a term of one year commencing October 1, 1943, at an annual rental payable in monthly installments. After the lease was signed the Office of Price Administration adopted a regulation subjecting the premises…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Cox v. . PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Jones v. Rochester Gas & Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Griffin v. . Interurban Street Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilbert v. ThierryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
- Kurland v. BukspanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Jerome v. YudtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
- Grzybicki v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Collins v. MinkinNew York Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.