Kurland v. Bukspan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
The complaint against defendant Lang was improperly dismissed. Acting either on his own behalf or on behalf of defendant Bukspan, defendant Lang exacted from plaintiff, charges for use of the leased premises in excess of the applicable maximum rent fixed by the Office of Price Administration. Regardless of whether defendant Lang was acting in the transaction as principal or agent, he is liable for the damages provided by the statute (Emergency Price Control Act of 1942; U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.), the prohibitions of which are directed against “ any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gordon v. HochbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunning v. Randall H. Hagner & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Woods v. BobbittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Glens Falls Insurance v. SybalskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Porter v. SchaeferDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Burns v. HeckleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.