Legal Opinion
State v. Babb
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 2001No. 26239PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Donna Babb appeals the denial of her motion to suppress evidence that she contends was the product of an illegal detention and arrest. Babb asserts that in denying her motion, the district court relied on facts that were not supported by evidence presented at the suppression hearing.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Babb was charged with possession of methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(1). She filed a motion to suppress “any and all evidence gathered against the defendant ...” based upon her assertion that “the warrantless seizure and arrest by the officers was unlawful and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. DelucaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- State v. WiggintonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. McBaineIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. George Alan KapelleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. CardenasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.