Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Skagit County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1969No. 39675Published

1DissentHill, J.

(dissenting)—I dissent. Bereft of the idyllic background created for it by the majority (and not substantiated in the record), Guemes2 is just across the channel from Fidalgo3—both islands a part of Skagit County and subject to zoning and rezoning like any other part of that county.

I, too, have examined the extensive record prepared by the planning commission and presented to the county commissioners. It comes to this court by way of the Skagit County Superior Court from whose judgment this appeal is taken. From this examination, I would present the following as the facts pertinent to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Parsons v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. National Bank of Washington v. McCrillisWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API