Legal Opinion
Aisenberg v. Royal Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 26, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract upon a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to one Hildreth, who *545assigned to the plaintiffs all his rights to claims arising thereunder. Copy of the policy is annexed to the declaration. In general Hildreth by the policy was insured against certain losses arising in conducting a trucking business. Specifically it was agreed that the policy should apply on merchandise of the insured’s own or held by the insured “in trust or on consignment or on commission while on board” designated motor vehicles “against the risks of . . . theft of an entire shipping…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Quinn v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Second Society of Universalists v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- McRae v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Parker v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Stetson v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Lynch v. Signal Finance Co. of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Friedman v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.