McRae v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries caused to the plaintiff by a fall. The declaration contained three counts, the first at common law, and the second and third under the employers’ liability act. R. L. c. 106, § 71. The jury found for the defendant upon the first count, and for the plaintiff upon the second and third. The case is before us upon the defendant’s exceptions.
One of the questions raised is whether the judge should have ruled as requested by the defendant that the plaintiff could not recover upon either the second or third counts. Upon this it appeared that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Hanna v. Jeffersonville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Sawyer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Best v. . Town of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Lennon v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Choate v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.