Legal Opinion

Mineral Resource, Technologies, L.L.C. v. Grand River Dam Authority

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1999No. 99-CV-501-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLMES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the complaint by Plaintiff Mineral Resource Technologies, L.L.C: (“MRT”) for declaratory judgment (Docket # 1). MRT seeks a declaration by this Court that a contract extension that MRT purportedly entered into with Defendant Grand River Dam Authority (“GRDA”) is valid and that the contract extension did not have to be competitively bid. MRT requested expedited consideration of its complaint.

At the initial hearing in this case on July 2, 1999, all parties agreed that the threshold question was whether applicable Oklahoma law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Waste Management, Inc. Ex Rel. Waste Management, Inc. Boeing v. Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling AuthorityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Taylor v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API