Legal Opinion

Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2002No. 01-6225PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to interpret a farmowners-ranchowners insurance policy clause that excludes coverage for “bodily injury or property damage arising out of business pursuits,” when the sequela of conducting a legitimate business activity on the property was the enhancement of the farm property covered by the policy. To do this, we must apply Oklahoma law in a dispute between two companies that have issued insurance policies.

Robert and Mary McQuary, husband and wife, purchased a farmowners-ranc-howners policy from Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Byers v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Wiley v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Bartel v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Krings v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Towns v. Northern Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. HilderbrandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. GarfinkelColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. v. HutchensDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. NAT. FARMERS UNION PROPERTY v. GarfinkelColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API