Arnold v. Ogle Construction Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentNorth, C. J.
In considering this appeal Mr. Justice Carr has concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to further compensation. I cannot agree with that result. The ground of my Brother’s holding seems to be as follows: “In his application for adjustment of claim plaintiff did not allege that the injury referred to was accidentally suffered or was accompanied by any fortuitous circumstance ;” and the further fact that notwithstanding plaintiff testified his injury did result from an accident (slipping) the commission did not expressly so find as a basis of awarding compensation. The controlling issue is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hagopian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Surtman v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Anderson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Common Council v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Kasarewski v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.