Legal Opinion

Kasarewski v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1946No. Docket No. 19, Calendar No. 43,181PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

From an award of compensation to plaintiff, defendants bring tbis appeal. Plaintiff was an employee of defendant Hupp Motor Car Corporation approximately 16 months prior to tbe event in consequence of which he seeks compensation. There is competent testimony in support of the department’s finding that plaintiff had a right femoral hernia when he began working for the Hupp Motor Car Corporation. In his work he lifted material weighing from 60- to 77 pounds. On October 31,1944, after he lifted a piece of material from the floor in the usual course of his work, he felt a pain in the region of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hagopian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Anderson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bell v. Hayes-Ionia Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. St. Clair v. A. H. Meyer Music HouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Arnold v. Ogle Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Samels v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wieda v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Croff v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API