Luker v. Starcraft Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The plaintiff-appellant (Luker) asks us to overturn the Board’s dismissal of his application for increased permanent partial impairment filed within two years of his accident but more than one year after the last day for which compensation was paid. Agreeing with the Board that the application was barred by section 45 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, we affirm.
Th¿ facts are not in dispute. Luker sustained an injury by accident on November 21, 1972, for which, pursuant to a *643board approved agreement that bis body as a whole was ten percent impaired permanently, he was paid compensation from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bagwell v. Chrysler CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Adams v. I. E. Smith Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gregg v. Sun Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Berry v. Anaconda Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989