Post v. Scheider
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Queens county. Action by Thomas L. Post against Joseph Scheider. Prom an order requiring plaintiff’s attorney to disclose plaintiff’s address plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPratt, J.
This is an appeal from an order requiring the plaintiff’s attorney to disclose the plaintiff’s address, and in default thereof staying the action. The power of the court to grant such is too well established to require argument. Walton v. Fairchild, 4 N. Y. Supp. 552; Tidd. Pr. (Amer. notes) 533, 534;. Ninety-Wine Plaintiffs v. Vanderbilt, 1 Abb. Pr. 193; Worton v. Smith, 6 Moore, 110. Such an order is discretionary,' and should not be reversed unless there is a clear ease of abuse of discretion. We think it was important to the defendant to know the address of the plaintiff, in order that he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 99 v. VanderbiltNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Walton v. FairchildCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Falkenhainer v. FalkenhainerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- In re TrainorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- In Re IllidgeOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- In re MalcomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Markevich v. Royal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.