Legal Opinion

Walton v. Fairchild

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 25, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to compel attorney to disclose the address of his client.

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, 0. J.

There is no doubt as to the authority of the court to direct a plaintiff’s attorney to disclose his client’s address, but the power should be exercised during the pendency of the action, and while the relation of attorney and client actually exists. The penalty for refusing the information is visited on the client by staying his action, or, if a defendant, by striking out his plea, (Tidd, Pr., Amer. Notes, 533, 534, .and see page 99; Plaintiffs v. Vanderbilt, 1 Abb. Pr. 193;) but no punishment is inflicted on the attorney, who is the mere confidential agent of the client,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 99 v. VanderbiltNew York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Neugass v. Terminal Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In re TrainorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Post v. ScheiderNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. In re MalcomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API