Legal Opinion
Fazio v. Cardillo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 8, 1940No. 7498PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
Appellant was employed as a cafeteria man in the service of the Mayflower Hotel Corporation in Washington City. He was injured March 11, 1938, while engaged in a personal altercation with Peter Smith, a co-employee, and applied for compensation under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s Act, made applicable to the District of Columbia by the Act of May 17, 1928. The deputy commissioner heard the evidence and rejected appellant’s claim. Application to the District Court for a mandatory injunction was denied, and the case is here on appeal.
Appellant’s duties were to serve food to employees of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Claim of Verschleiser v. Joseph Stern & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Matter of Scholtzhauer v. . C. L. Lunch Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Continental Life Insurance v. GoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Ingrid Fisher v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lucero-Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.