Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clay Thomas v. Scott Eschen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2019No. 17-3385PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1ConcurrenceLoken, Circuit Judge

STRAS, Circuit Judge.

Clay Thomas, an Iowa state prisoner, claims that prison officials violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they had him civilly committed and forcibly medicated. Because Thomas's wrongful-commitment claim "is not cognizable under [ 42 U.S.C.] § 1983," Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 , 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364 , 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and his forced-medication claim lacks evidentiary support, we affirm the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment dismissing both claims.

I

Iowa prison officials successfully applied to have Thomas civilly committed in 2013. See…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Timothy Bell v. Kwame RaoulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  2. Catherine Brennan v. Cass County HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  3. Abram v. ChathamDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  4. Abram v. SohlerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
  5. Brennan v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API