Legal Opinion

Dodgeland Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2002No. 00-0277PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. Dodgeland Education Association (Association) appeals from an order *363affirming a Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (WERC) decision finding that an item, such as the teacher preparation time memorandum, must be a mandatory subject of bargaining in order to be a "fringe benefit" within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 111.70(l)(nc)l.a. (1997-98),1 and that teacher preparation time is not a mandatory but rather a permissive subject of bargaining and, therefore, is not a fringe benefit. The Association first argues that teacher preparation time is a mandatory subject of bargaining because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. West Bend Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ferraro v. KoelschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State-Department of Corrections v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Epic Staff Management, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API