Dodgeland Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. Dodgeland Education Association (Association) appeals from an order *363affirming a Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (WERC) decision finding that an item, such as the teacher preparation time memorandum, must be a mandatory subject of bargaining in order to be a "fringe benefit" within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 111.70(l)(nc)l.a. (1997-98),1 and that teacher preparation time is not a mandatory but rather a permissive subject of bargaining and, therefore, is not a fringe benefit. The Association first argues that teacher preparation time is a mandatory subject of bargaining because…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- West Bend Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Ferraro v. KoelschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State-Department of Corrections v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Epic Staff Management, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.