Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Poole

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

The judgment sought to be set aside by this suit was affirmed by this Court, September 26th, 1885, in the case of Poole v. Dilworth, 26 W. Va. 583. The facts shown by the record are as follows : John Dilworth and John J. Dilworth, by their joint obligation, dated May 14th, 1873, bound them: selves to pay to Eliza A. M. Litzinger and James Rogers $250.00. This bond was in June, 1873, assigned to Patrick F. Poole, who afterwards brought an action thereon before a justice of Taylor county. The summons issued against both the obligors in the bond but was served upon John Dilworth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poole v. DilworthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Merchants' & Mechanics' Bank of Wheeling v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Newman v. MollohanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Tingle Adm'r v. FisherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hall v. Bank of VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Conley v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Ferguson v. MillenderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. American Waterworks & Guarantee Co. v. Home Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API