Legal Opinion · Dissent

Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1961Published

1Dissent

Fuld, J. (dissenting in part).

I would affirm the judgment in its entirety, for I believe, with the courts below, that the plaintiff is entitled to interest as a matter of law.

There can be no doubt that an award of interest is necessary to afford a plaintiff, whose property has been damaged, full indemnity for the wrong done to him by the defendant. And it is equally indisputable that on principle such a plaintiff, whether his property is lost to him through the defendant’s willfulness or negligence, is entitled to interest, as part of his damages, as a matter of right. Indeed, Chief Judge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hyde v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Beals v. GuernseyNew York Supreme Court · 1811

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API