Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Fuld, J. (dissenting in part).
I would affirm the judgment in its entirety, for I believe, with the courts below, that the plaintiff is entitled to interest as a matter of law.
There can be no doubt that an award of interest is necessary to afford a plaintiff, whose property has been damaged, full indemnity for the wrong done to him by the defendant. And it is equally indisputable that on principle such a plaintiff, whether his property is lost to him through the defendant’s willfulness or negligence, is entitled to interest, as part of his damages, as a matter of right. Indeed, Chief Judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hyde v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Beals v. GuernseyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.