Legal Opinion
Pipes v. Smith
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 15, 1987No. 65955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
This case involves an automobile accident between Plaintiff/Appellant, Barbara Ruth Pipes and Defendant/Appellee, Marion Kay Smith. Defendant/Appellee, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company is the carrier of uninsured motorist coverage for Ms. Pipes. Liability was admitted by Ms. Smith and the case was tried on the issue of damages only. The jury returned a verdict in the amount of $6,828, of which $3,728 was designated as reasonable medical expenses.
Plaintiffs/Appellants, Barbara Ruth Pipes and John H. Pipes, moved for a new trial on grounds that damages awarded them were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Taloga v. Farmers' State Guaranty Bank of ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Federal Surety Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Gustin v. CarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Sooner Drainboard Co. v. DeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- WILBANKS SECURITIES, INC. v. McFarlandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- TRUEL v. ANDOLINI'S, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017