King v. Dawson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtFlx, C. J.
This is the third appeal in this case. 121 S. W. 917, and 171 S. W. 257. The case is fully stated in the two opinions on the former appeals. The two reversals took place because the trial judge failed and refused to submit questions of fact to the jury. The trial from which this appeal arises resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of $7,500. The cause was submitted on special issues.
The facts on the last appeal of this case indicated to this court, and it was so found, that in going upstairs through the hole that had been cut for a staircase “it was absolutely necessary to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrison v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Felch v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. ReidenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- New York & New Jersey Telephone Co. v. SpeicherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- T. & P. R'y Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dawson v. KingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Menestrina v. St. Louis National Stock YardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935