Legal Opinion

Hascup v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1982No. 7643; CIVIL NO. 54442PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam..

The City and County of Honolulu (City) appeals a jury verdict against it for negligence and raises three specifications of error to this court: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to grant its motion for directed verdict; (2) that the trial court erred in modifying its version of verdict form that would have required the jury to first find the existence of a dangerous condition; and (3) that the trial court erred in refusing to hear the testimony of a former deputy corporation counsel offered for impeachment purposes only.

On the morning of July 11, 1976, Plaintiff Mildred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Budget Rent-A-Car CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. FaulknerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Cafarella v. CharHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Harris v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gump v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Alt v. KruegerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Corbett v. Association of Apartment Owners of Wailua Bayview ApartmentsHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cooley v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API