Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Telford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1938No. Civil No. 3893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

The record on this appeal presents the following state of facts, and the only question for ns to determine is the law applicable thereto.

On the 28th of February, 1936, Loto S. Daniel and Bessie J. Daniel, his wife, E. C. Seale and Clara L. Seale, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, filed a complaint against H. A. Telford and Florence M. Tel-ford, his wife, Edna A. Munger and Charles P. Munger, her husband, hereinafter called defendants, seeking to recover for an alleged breach of contract by defendants. On the 14th of March the defendants demurred to plaintiffs’ complaint. On the 18th of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Arizona Enterprise Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Moulton v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Miller v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Faltis v. ColachisArizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dollar a Day Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Scott v. GAC Finance CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API