Legal Opinion

Scott v. GAC Finance Corporation

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1971No. 10337PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

From a default judgment taken by the plaintiff-appellee against defendant-appellant, the defendant brings this appeal.

The facts of the case are as follows: The plaintiff sued the defendant and defendant’s wife on a promissory note. The process server served the defendant’s wife personally with a copy of the summons and complaint at the place where she was living, and he also left a copy of the summons and complaint with the defendant’s wife, for the defendant. At the time the summons and complaint were left with defendant’s wife, the defendant and his wife had separated and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sara A. Karlsson v. Baruch RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Earle v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Ames Nowell v. Iris Calder NowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marks v. LaBergeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. RaptonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5860Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. SH v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API