Legal Opinion

State v. Alfaro-Valleda

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 2022No. 122301PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,301 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DENIS ANTONIO ALFARO-VALLEDA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Autopsy photographs that illustrate the nature and extent of wounds are admissible when they corroborate the testimony of a witness, including a witness who is not a pathologist or a medical examiner. 2. If a prosecutor uses the words "we know" when drawing inferences for the jury rather than recounting uncontroverted evidence, the prosecutor errs even if drawing a reasonable inference. 3. When a judge admits evidence for a limited purpose but…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. ZongkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. ScheetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API