Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Fallin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1936No. 26344PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant company was clearing a right of way for the laying of a pipe line. It was necessary to remove surfaces o-f high places and fill in nearby low places with the dirt therefrom. The plaintiff, a farmer, lived nearby. He brought his team of mules, harness and slip, and worked for the defendant, removing and transporting the earth and other substances short distances for about six days before his mules were injured, for which injury he recovered damages against the defendant, .'and the defendant appeals.

The mules were injured by the slip belonging to plaintiff. A slip, such as was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Lakey v. North McAlester Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. DempseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. SkeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Hull v. Oklahoma City Baseball Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Nelson v. Wasteka Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Donahoe v. MoultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API