Legal Opinion
Tannage Patent Co. v. Zahn
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided March 26, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions
This was a bill by the Tannage Patent Company against William Zahn for infringement of patents for processes of tanning leather.
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, District Judge.
The bill of complaint charges the defendant, William Zahn, with infringement of letters patent Nos. 291,784 and 291,785, both granted on January 8, 1884, to Augustus Schultz, for new and improved processes for “tawing hides and skins,” and which were duly assigned by the patentee to the complainant. There seems to be but little difference in the two pro cesses, as claimed in the respective patents. In patent No. 291,784 it is said that:
“This invention relates to a new process for tawing hides or skins, said process consisting in subjecting said hides or skins to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Tyler v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Novadel Process Corporation v. JP Meyer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Elliott Addressing Mach. Co. v. Wallace Addressing Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930