Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lynd v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1996No. 95-30588Published

1DissentDennis, Circuit Judge

This court is required to review de novo the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment to the insurance company and the employer, applying the same criteria employed by the court in the first instance. Harper v. Harris County, Texas, 21 F.3d 597 (5th Cir.1994). Thus, this panel should reverse unless “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show *985that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API