H. R. Basford Co. v. Jones
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, Chief Judge.
The H. R. Basford Company and Seymour Smith and Son, Inc., petitioners for an order for arbitration under Title 9 U.S.C. § 4, have moved to dismiss the patent infringement counterclaim contained in the respondent’s answer. As grounds for their motion petitioners assert that the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is not the proper venue for an action of patent infringement against either of the petitioners, alleging specifically that neither petitioner is incorporated in Colorado, has committed acts of infringement in Colorado, or has a regular and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Sylvania Industrial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Global Shipping and Trading, Ltd. v. Verkhnesaldincky Metallurgic Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968