Legal Opinion

People v. Hoosier

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1914No. Crim. No. 245PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County and from an order refusing a new trial. John L. Childs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of statutory rape upon one May Bartol, a female of the age of about eleven years, and brings the ease to this court on an appeal from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.

This case contains the final chapters of -the story of a veritable saturnalia of lechery which was carried on, during the month of February, 1913, at Crescent City, Del Norte County. The initial chapter of the series of malodorous transactions is given in the case of the People v. Bartol, (Crim. No. 244,) ante, p. 659, [142 Pac. 510], the opinion in which was filed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. BartolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API