People v. Bartol
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County and from an order refusing a new trial. John L. Childs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
We can see no valid objection to the information in this case, which, in its charging part, is as follows: “Ruby E. Bartol is accused by the district attorney of the said county of Del Norte by this information of the crime of rape, committed as follows: That said Ruby E. Bartol, did on or about the 8th day of February, A. D. 1913, at and in said county of Del Norte, state of California, and before the filing of this information, then and there willfully and unlawfully and feloniously help, aid, and assist and abet one Orville Taggart in the perpetration and accomplishment of an act of sexual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. BorregoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.