Legal Opinion

Herrod v. City of North Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1977No. 76-191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The City of North Little Rock, by Ordinance #4453, sought to annex seven separate tracts of lands lying in Pulaski County which it denominated Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. The Election Commission submitted the matter to a vote at the 1974 General Election on the sole issue of “For Annexation” or “Against Annexation” so that it was a take all or leave all proposition. Appellants contested the annexation with respect to Tracts A, B, C and F. After a stipulation was entered into admitting that all of the remonstrants either reside in or are property owners in Tracts A, B…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. City of Little Rock v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Saunders v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gay v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Gay v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API